Paper or pixel?

Matthew Epstein spent $3,000 out of his own pocket to create a marketing campaign aimed to cajole Google into hiring him. He created an engaging mustachioed character, built a website, and then did what he did best. Market the hell outta it.

What has he got to show for it? How does >10k Facebook likes, >3k tweets, and 2.8k Google +s sound? His story has been covered by top media sites like TechCrunch. While he hasn’t officially been offered a job at Google, I don’t think it’s that far a leap to say that it’s just a matter of time. According to his blog, he has already been contacted by Google recruiters. And what happens if Google doesn’t pick him up? I wouldn’t be surprised if top agencies snap him up in a heartbeat.

Stellar work.

It’s exciting to see creative folk thinking outside the box and using really exciting new ways to sell themselves. These guys caught my eye as well:

and

So does this mean that the traditional cover letter and resume combo has begun to become obsolete?

In this digital space? I would say so.

Some months ago, I decided to get rid of my physical resume. Why? I felt that having to click to download it from an email seemed too arduous for a time when you have, quite literally, the world at your fingertips. Instead, I kept my online presence up-to-date and concise. My CV can be found on LinkedIn, my thoughts and findings can be read on my blog, and my Twitter gives you pretty good idea of my personal style. I combine all these elements together to give future employers or clients a good idea of my education, experience and working style. This, I feel, is far more effective than any .PDF or (god forbid) .doc resume I’ve ever sent out/received. By a mile.

What are your thoughts? Resumes – paper or pixel?

 

- Cross-posted on Propaganda House

Share

Group120: streetwise

My year with Labsome at RMIT University has finally come to an end. It has been bittersweet to say the least. At more than one point I questioned myself: “what the fuck are you doing with yourself?” Sure, admittedly, I resented having to go to classes and doing the work, convinced that I could be doing so much more by myself in ‘the real world’. In retrospect, I do think that it was a good experience that sneakily taught me some vital skills without me even realising it. While I wouldn’t be signing up for another year any time soon, I would not discourage others from going through this route – whether or not you are heading towards a PhD.

My year was spent studying and researching social media marketing, particularly in the area of independent music marketing. I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity to work with Group120 and use them as the group as my subject of study. In this project, I looked very closely at specific case studies and developed and executed some proven strategies for the group. I was also involved in social media training: having group members familiarise themselves with the various tools and platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Reverbnation and Tumblr. My study and findings have all been collated in a full cohesive project.

Read the full report HERE

Share

$0.00, the future of business

Chris Anderson, also of Wired magazine, wrote a very interesting article about the business of “free”. He says, “Once a marketing gimmick, free has emerged as a full-fledged economy”. He attributes this to the falling costs of producing digital content.

“The Web is all about scale, finding ways to attract the most users for centralized resources, spreading those costs over larger and larger audiences as the technology gets more and more capable. It’s not about the cost of the equipment in the racks at the data centre; it’s about what that equipment can do. And every year, like some sort of magic clockwork, it does more and more for less and less, bringing the marginal costs of technology in the units that we individuals consume closer to zero.”

A fantastic example of this would be Radiohead’s album titled In Rainbows that was released in 2007. The band allowed their fans to pay any amount they liked. And yes, that also included $0.00. While official figures were never released by the band’s management, Owsinski’s book on Music 3.0 quoted market research company comScore’s findings to be: 48% of the downloads were paid for, 4% of which paid $20 (the retail cost of a CD) and 12% paid between $8 to $12. These are some pretty telling statistics, that remind us that the True Fan does exist.

In the article, he reminds us that offering a product (such as an audio file, in this case) for free does not mean that you have absolutely zero profits. Instead, he encourages us to consider the idea that providing something for free can lead to something else. Perhaps linking this to Kelly’s 1,000 True Fans Theory, Lesser Fans may be nurtured into True Fans by feeding them with free content; telling them that the artist cares about their fans by rewarding them for supporting their music.

Share

1,000 Fans Theory

Kevin Kelly of Wired magazine wrote about the 1,000 fans theory, where he claims that an artist only needs 1,000 “true fans” to be successful, and maintain that success. He says:

“A creator, such as [a]… musician… needs to acquire only 1,000 True Fans to make a living.

A True Fan is defined as someone who will purchase anything and everything you produce. They will drive 200 miles to see you sing. They will buy te super deluxe re-issued hi-res box set of your stuff even though they have the low-res version. They have a Google Alert set for your name. They bookmark the eBay page where your out-of-print editions show up. They come to your openings. They have you sign their copies. They buy the t-shrt, and the mug, and the hat. They can’t wait till you issue your next work. They are true fans.”

He reminds us that this number is not that difficult to achieve because through social media marketing in Music 3.0, the artist has access to a global audience.

Aside from the True Fans, Kelly reminds us that there will also be a group of Lesser Fans. These people might not need or want to follow your every move, or purchase every single thing that you put out, but they are not to be neglected as Lesser Fans can always be nurtured to become True Fans. He suggests that artists do this by connecting and interacting with their fans via networks like blogs, Facebook and MySpace. Work archives may be stored on websites that can easily be referred to by any interested party.

Share

Tourism ads going viral: Australia & Iceland going head-to-head

We’ve seen the Tourism Australia ad making its rounds across social media networks in the last few weeks. It’s no secret that many Australians absolutely hate the ads. Most of the responses I’ve seen around the InterWebs have talked about how boring, unoriginal and cliched the ad is. It seems, locals aren’t taking too kindly to being compared to “tone-deaf bogans“.

I particularly enjoyed this gem by @DuncanRiley:

@DuncanRiley

I have to admit, I do agree on some level. The ad looks like it’s been pulled off one of those awful daytime television shows called Planet’s Funniest Commercials (usually bundled together with the Planet’s Unfunniest Host) or something. Cliched Australian icons that have been reused to death (I mean, seriously, did they really have to open with surfers watching the sunset??). But okay, sure, I guess it’s sort of cute and can kind of imagine an old gal in her 60s going, “Aww, remember what an awesome time we had in Australia 25 years ago? We really should go back some time soon to visit!” Maybe that’s just me.

And then a couple of days ago, we see Iceland ads racing around Twitter and blogs.

Yes it’s a little weird, and I find myself fidgeting while I’m watching it – I’m just not sure if I should be singing along, admiring the cinematography, or mimicking some of the hilarious dance moves (check out the dudes at 01:11), but I think I actually enjoy it. My opinion is probably biased though, because the song they used is one of my absolute favourites to dance to while making pancakes on a sunny Sunday morning. Plus, I think Emiliana Torrini is amazing and beautiful and I want to be her. Digression aside (ha, was that ironic?), I think this video really encapsulates Iceland’s quirky nature. They’ve got the crazy volcanoes with crazy names (that I still need to Google for reference), huge geysers in their backyards and, of course, they have Bjork. Need I really go on?

So who wins in the Iceland vs Australia tourism ad war? I say, hands down, Iceland. Iceland had embraced the quirky (read: weird) and used it to their advantage. Sure, they have the standard landscape shots of rivers, mountains yadayadablabla, but they’ve managed to identify one thing that truly sets Iceland apart. In comparison, all the Australian ad does is remind us about what we already know about Australia. My question to them is: So What?

Ding ding ding, one-nil to Iceland. Any more competitors want to jump into the ring and get down and dirty with the weird?

Share