My online identity

I signed up to Twitter in 2008. The now-defunct handle I used was @nadiatweets. I used this account as a personal (not private) chat room and news feed for friends that I had left behind in Singapore (born and bred), and people that I had met while I was travelling. I started out as a fairly passive user, but started gaining momentum as time passed, realising how good Twitter at being a training tool for myself as a writer. I wrote about my life, my friends, and people on the 86 tram. @nadiatweets was personal, engaging, and potentially humorous (debatable).

In late 2009, I signed up for another Twitter account, @ElliotOwl. This account was to be, in contrast, my ‘professional identity’. Alongside this account, I also set up a blogdelicious stacksVimeo and so on. I was very careful with what I posted across these different networks, as I wanted to be ‘professional’. I wrote about work, and only about work, and made no effort to inject any hint of my personality at all. I used Twitter to ‘engage’ with thought leaders in the digital communications space. By which, I mean that I did a lot of retweeting. A lot. I wanted future employers to see @ElliotOwl and be impressed by the depth and breadth of knowledge that I hoped I demonstrated in my writing and my research. @ElliotOwl was dry, boring, and robotic.

Fast forward a few months: I reviewed my stats. I had 30 followers on @nadiatweets, and 200 followers on @ElliotOwl. In spite of that, I had dozens of @ replies and DMs on @nadiatweets, but hardly the same could be said for @ElliotOwl. The total number of @s, DMs and RTs that I had collected in those few months could be counted on two, sad, lonely, poorly moisturised hands.

The conclusion? As much as we try to exist and co-exist in the online space and use it increasingly as a communication tool, people still want to know people. People want to interact with people. Employers still want to hire people. Not robots.

It doesn’t matter how much you know, how much you read, and how many Seth Godinand Clay Shirky quotes you’ve retweeted. Learning is easy. Reading is easier. Anyone can do a Google search, read a blog and claim to be an expert/guru/ninja of their chosen discipline. How do you make yourself stand out?

One crucial thing that we sometimes forget, given the incredible speed of which technology grows and develops, is that we are not, in actual fact, an astoundingly complex species. We all crave human interaction, on multiple levels. Even more so, I feel, in this present day where we sometimes prefer to send a text message than speak on the phone, or choose to ‘like’ a status update than meet an old friend for a coffee. We are losing ourselves in a sea of boring, soulless, robots.

The irony is that we try so hard to make ourselves more present by hiding behind a keyboard and a computer screen.

Go back to basics. Talk to somebody. Start a conversation. Make a friend.

I have since deleted @nadiatweets, and made @ElliotOwl my main channel of communication online. I still tweet about my life, my friends, and people on the 86 tram, but I no longer make a distinction between my personal life and my professional life. I connect to many friends, people that I work with, have worked with, and will potentially work with on a far more personal level than I ever have before. I now know their likes, dislikes, whether they are a dog person or cat person, their choice cafes and restaurants, and whether they are looking to hire. I am not ‘networking’ any more. I am making friends.

The result? An uncountable number of connections made with some very clever and interesting people, and a very satisfactory number of work and collaboration opportunities.

I have not written this blog post with the intention of encouraging you to make your personal lives more public. Certainly not. Instead, take a look at the content that you’re putting out there in your name. What does it say about you? What input have you given. Are these your thoughts, and your opinions? Are you putting yourself out there as a person, or a robot?

We’ve gone through the benefits of positioning yourself as a media practitioner in the online space time and time again; opens multiple doors, allows you to connect with anyone and everyone, breaking physical/geographical boundaries etc. Now it’s time to think about how we can put that in practice, in the best way that we can.

Questions? Feedback? Leave a comment, @ me at @ElliotOwl (#im212) or connect with me on LinkedIn.

-

Cross posted HERE

Share

Paper or pixel?

Matthew Epstein spent $3,000 out of his own pocket to create a marketing campaign aimed to cajole Google into hiring him. He created an engaging mustachioed character, built a website, and then did what he did best. Market the hell outta it.

What has he got to show for it? How does >10k Facebook likes, >3k tweets, and 2.8k Google +s sound? His story has been covered by top media sites like TechCrunch. While he hasn’t officially been offered a job at Google, I don’t think it’s that far a leap to say that it’s just a matter of time. According to his blog, he has already been contacted by Google recruiters. And what happens if Google doesn’t pick him up? I wouldn’t be surprised if top agencies snap him up in a heartbeat.

Stellar work.

It’s exciting to see creative folk thinking outside the box and using really exciting new ways to sell themselves. These guys caught my eye as well:

and

So does this mean that the traditional cover letter and resume combo has begun to become obsolete?

In this digital space? I would say so.

Some months ago, I decided to get rid of my physical resume. Why? I felt that having to click to download it from an email seemed too arduous for a time when you have, quite literally, the world at your fingertips. Instead, I kept my online presence up-to-date and concise. My CV can be found on LinkedIn, my thoughts and findings can be read on my blog, and my Twitter gives you pretty good idea of my personal style. I combine all these elements together to give future employers or clients a good idea of my education, experience and working style. This, I feel, is far more effective than any .PDF or (god forbid) .doc resume I’ve ever sent out/received. By a mile.

What are your thoughts? Resumes – paper or pixel?

 

- Cross-posted on Propaganda House

Share

Prominence of social networking in Australia

A recent 2010 Nielsen study Social Networks/Blogs Now Account for One in Every Four and a Half Minutes Online found that globally, we spend about 110 billion minutes on social networks and blogs, which accounts for one in every four and a half minutes spent online. The average amount of time spent on these sites has gone up from about three and a half hours, to about six hours per month in 2010 (at the time the study was conducted in April 2010).

Another study Australia Getting More Social Online as Facebook Leads and Twitter Grows tells us:

“Nearly four in five (78%) of Australia’s nine million social media users sent or shared a photo in the past year and nearly three quarters (74%) sent or shared a link. The biggest increases in social media usage were reading and posting on Twitter, reading wikis and engaging with brands and organizations via social media.”

It is interesting to note that about two in every five Australians online is actively interacting with companies and brands via various social networks, telling us that Australians are becoming more receptive to social media marketing efforts. Almost nine in ten Australians online look to their peers for feedback and recommendations; engaging in a conversation with and/or about the company or brand.

In the same report, it is also stated that about 43% of Australians online own a smartphone. Mobile social networking has also become drastically popular in the last year with major telcos like Optus and Three offering unlimited Facebook and Twitter access. The top four social networks visited via smartphones are Facebook (92%), YouTube (18%), Twitter (18%) and MySpace (9%).

Share

TwitChange: celebs on Twitter raising funds for Haiti

So here’s an interesting new fund-raising concept: Celebs are offering to reply to your tweet, or retweet you for money on. Big-wigs who are on board include Eva Longoria (@EvaLongoria), Frankie Muniz (@frankiemuniz), Nicole Richie (@nicolerichie), Ryan Seacrest (@ryanseacrest), Justin Bieber (@justinbieber) and even Perez Hilton (@perezhilton). I’m a little surprised they haven’t managed to rope in social media A-lister Ashton Kutcher (@aplusk) to the cause. Probably because if they did, he would probably break Twitter with his close-to six million followers?

Twitchange:

“The only global celebrity auction where Twitter users can bid to get three things: be followed by their favorite celebrity on Twitter, retweeted, or mentioned by them in a special tweet!”

I personally do not see the need to have some celebrity retweeting one of my asinine tweets (not that my tweets are usually asinine, of course), but I wouldn’t be surprised to see how much someone with as much influence on Twitter as Justin Bieber has, could potentially raise.

Share

Dating Brian

So a few days ago, I wrote about the online dating world. This is Brian, a baby New Yorker (having just moved from Milwaukee, as his profile suggests), who is letting the Internet find him a date. In particular, 30 dates, in 30 dates. It’s a pretty interesting concept, and Brian has been active on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube, getting recommendations of people to date, places to go and general dating suggestions. A quick glance on his Facebook page showed that he’s been getting attention from all sorts of areas; from girls who want to date him, guys who want to recommend a good spot for a first date, and even a dating portal who was interested in working out a business deal with him. Ha, fancy that!

The Dating Brian community seems to be growing exponentially as we speak. I’d be most interested to watch and see how this pans out. The Internet as a Love Catalyst? Ahoy!

Share